فهرست:
خلاصه فارسی................................................................................................................................1
فصل اول: مروری بر متون و مقالات
مقدمه.............................................................................................................................................3
کلیات............................................................................................................................................5
معرفی کامپوزیت رزین...................................................................................................................5
اجزای تشکیل دهنده کامپوزیت ها..................................................................................................6
طبقه بندی کامپوزیت ها................................................................................................................11
خواص کامپوزیت ها....................................................................................................................13
انقباض پلیمریزاسیون.....................................................................................................................13
خواص مکانیکی...........................................................................................................................15
ویژگی های حرارتی.....................................................................................................................16
جذب آب....................................................................................................................................16
سایش...........................................................................................................................................16
معرفی کامپوزیت های سایلوران....................................................................................................17
مقاومت شکست...........................................................................................................................18
اندازه گیری مقاومت شکست........................................................................................................20
نیرو ها و استرس جویدن...............................................................................................................21
مروری بر مقالات.........................................................................................................................23
کامپوزیت و استحکام شکست دندان.............................................................................................23
سایلوران ها...................................................................................................................................31
بیان مسئله و ضرورت انجام تحقیق.................................................................................................42
اهداف و فرضیات.........................................................................................................................43
فصل دوم:روش کار و مواد
مواد..............................................................................................................................................45
روش مطالعه.................................................................................................................................47
جمع آوری و مانت نمونه ها..........................................................................................................47
تهیه حفرات..................................................................................................................................48
مراحل ترمیم نمونه ها....................................................................................................................49
تست مقاومت شکست..................................................................................................................53
فصل سوم:یافته ها
یافته ها...................................................................................................................................................................56
فصل چهارم:بحث
بحث............................................................................................................................................60
فصل پنجم:نتیجه گیری و پیشنهادات
نتیجه گیری..................................................................................................................................67
پیشنهادات....................................................................................................................................67
منابع.............................................................................................................................................68
خلاصه انگلیسی
منبع:
Navarra CO, Cadenaro M, Armstrong SR, Jessop J,Antoniolli F, et al. Degree of conversion of Filtek Silorane Adhesive System and Clearfil SE Bond within the hybrid and adhesive layer: An in situ Raman analaysis. Dent Mater. 2009;25(9):1178-85.
Tezvergil-Multuay A, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Incremental layers bonding of silorane composite: The initial bonding properties. J Dent. 2008;36(7):560-3.
Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Swift EJ. Sturdevant's art and sciences of operative dentistry. 5 th ed. USA : Duncan L; 2006.P. 648-54, 140, 245-59,181-9, 262-4.
Civelek A, Ersoy M, L'Hotelier E, Soyman M, Say EC. Polymerization shrinkage and microleakage in class II cavities of various resin composites. Oper Dent 2003;28(5):635-41.
Al-Boni R, Raja O. Microleakage evaluation of silorane based composite versus methacrylate based composite. J Conserv Dent. 2010;13(3):152-5.
Charton C, Colon P, Pla F. Shrinkage stress in light-cured composite resins:Influence of material and photoactivation mode. Dent Mater. 2007;23(8):911-20.
Kugel G. Direct and indirect adhesive restorative materials: A review. Am J Dent 2000; 13(Spec No):35D-40D.
Powers JM, Sakagushi RL. Editors. Craig's restorative dental materials. 12th ed.St Louis: Mosby Co; 2006.p.190-192,194,198,5,63,64.
Bowen RL. Properties of silica reinforced polymer for dental restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 1963;66:57-64.
Phillips RW. Skinners science of dental materials. 9th ed. Philadelphia:WB Saunders; 1991.
Hilton TJ, Broome JC. Direct Posterior Aesthetic Restorations. In: Sumitt JB, Hilton TJ, Schwartz RS. Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry: A Contemporary Approach. 3rd ed. London: Quintessence Pub Co; 2006.
Sturdevant CM, Roberson TM, Heymann HO. The art and sciences of operative dentistry. 3 th ed.Mosby;1994.
Dental material properties and manipulation.2000.
Chung KH. The relationship between composition and properties of posterior resin composites. J Dent Res. 1990;69(3):852-6.
Bayne SC.Heymann Ho. Swift EJ Jr: Update on dental composite restorations.J Am Dent Assoc. 1994;125(6):687-701.
Lang BR, Jaarda M, Wang RF: Filler particle size and composite resin classification system. J Oral Rehabil. 1992;19(6):569-84.
Alani AH, Toh CG. Detection of microleakage around dental restorations: a review. Oper Dent 1997; 22(4):173-85.
Yap AU, Seneviratne C. Influence of light energy dentistry on effectiveness of composite cure. Oper Dent 2001; 26(5):460-6.
Mc Donald RE, Avery DR, Dean JA. Dentistry for the child and adolescent. 8th ed.USA: Patricia Tannian;2004. P.344-6.
Sidu SK. The effect of acid-etched dentin on marginal seal. Quintessence Int 1994;25(11):797-800.
Ferracane JL. Current trends in dental composites.Crit Rev Oral Bio Med.1995;6(4):302-18.
Chaung SF, Jin YT, Liu JK, Chang CH, Shieh DB. Influence of flowable composite lining thickness on class II composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2004;29(3):301-8.
Mitchel C. Dental Material in Operative Dentistry. 1st ed. London: Quintessence Pub Co; 2008.p.1,17,18.
França FM, Worschech CC, Paulillo LA, Martins LR, Lovadino JR. Fracture resistance of premolar teeth restored with different filling techniques.J Contemp Dent Pract. 2005;6(3):62-9.
Rees JS, Jagger DC, Williams DR, Brown G, Duguid W. A reappraisal of the incremental packing technique for light cured composite resins. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31(1):81-4.
Belli S, Erdemir A, Ozcopur M, Eskitascioglu G. The effect of fibre insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite.Int Endod J. 2005;38(2):73-80.
Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Ritter AV, Periera PNR. Introduction to composite restorations. In: Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Swift EJ editors. Sturdevant's Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. 5th ed. St Louis: Mosby Co;2006.p.504.
Donly KJ, Wild TW, Bowen RL, Jensen ME. An in vitro investigation of the effects of glass inserts on the effective composite resin polymerization shrinkage. J Dent Res.1989;68(8):1234-7
Lazarchik DA, Hammond BD, Sikes CL, Looney SW, Rueggeberg FA. Hardness comparison of bulk-filled/transtooth and incremental-filled/occlusally irradiated composite resins.J Prosthet Dent. 2007;98(2):129-40.
El-Mowafy O, El-Badrawy W, Eltanty A, Abbasi K, Habib N. Gingival microleakage of class II resin composites with fiber inserts. Oper Dent. 2007;32(3):298-305.
Hilton TJ, Broome JC. Direct Posterior Aesthetic Restorations. In: Sumitt JB, Hilton TJ, Schwartz RS. Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry: A Contemporary Approach. 3rd ed. London: Quintessence Pub Co; 2006.p.297-8,314,317.
Boaro LC, Gonçalves F, Guimarães TC, Ferracane JL, Versluis A, Braga RR. Polymerization stress, shrinkage and elastic modulus of current low-shrinkage restorative composites.Dent Mater. 2010;26(12):1144-50. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
Krifka S, Federlin M, Hiller KA, Schmalz G. Microleakage of silorane- and methacrylate-basedclassVcompositerestorations. Clin Oral Investig. 2011 Sep 27. [Epub ahead of print]
Zhao D, Botsis J, Drummond JL. Fracture studies of selected dental restorative composites. Dent Mater. 1997;13(3):198-207.
Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Chen HY, Hickel R. Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater. 2000;16(1):33-40.
Pisarski H. Fracture toughness testing; [1 screen]. Available at URL:http://www.twi.co.uk/content/kscsw011.html. Accessed June 19,2009.
Bonilla ED, Mardirossian G, Caputo AA. Fracture toughness of posterior resin composites. Quintessence Int. 2001;32(3):206-10.
Tantbirojn D, Versluis A, Cheng YS, D oughlas WH. Fracture toughness and microhardness of a composite: do they correlate? J Dent. 2003;31(2):89-95.
Xu HH, Schumacher GE, Eichmiller FC, Peterson RC, Antonucci JM, Muller HJ. Continuous-fiber perform reinforcement of dental resin composite restoration. Dent Mater.2003;19(6):523-30.
Anusavice KJ. Phillips' Science of Dental Materials. 11th ed. St Louis: Saunders; 2003.p.73,93-94.
Eakle WS. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with class II bonded composite resin. J Dent Res. 1986;65(2):149-53.
Purk JH, Eick JD, DeSchepper EJ, Chappell RP, Tira DE. Fracture strength of class I versus class II restored premolars tested at the marginal ridge. Standard preparations. Quintessence Int. 1990;21(7):545-51.
Collins CJ, Bryant RW, Hodge KL. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations: 8-year findings. J Dent. 1998;26(4):311-7.
Yap AU. Effectiveness of polymerization in composites restorative claiming bulk placement: impact of cavity depth and exposure time. Oper Dent. 2000;25(2):113-20.
Bhardwaj TPN, Solmon O, Parameswaran A. Tooth restored with composite resin- a comporative analysis. Trends Biomater Artif. Organs 2002;15(2): 57-60.
de Freitas CR, Miranda MI, de Andrade MF, Flores VH, Vaz LG, Guimaraes C. Resistance to maxillary premolar fractures after restoration of class II preparations with resin composite or ceromer. Quintessence Int. 2002;33(8):589-94.
Figueiredo Reis A, Giannini M, Ambrosano GM, Chan DC. The effects of filling techniques and a low–viscosity composite liner on bond strength to class II cavities. J Dent. 2003;31(1): 59-66.
Poskus LT, Placido E, Cardoso PE. Influence of placement techniques on Vickers and Knoop hardness of class II composite resin restorations.Dent Mater. 2004;20(8):726-32.
Ozgünaltay G, Görücü J. Fracture resistance of class II packable composite restorations with and without flowable liners.J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32(2):111-5.
Taha DG, Abdel-Samad AA, Mahmoud SH. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars with class II MOD cavities restored with Ormocer, Nanofilled, and Nanoceramic composite restorative systems.Quintessence Int. 2011;42(7):579-87.
Ilie N, Hickel R. Silorane-based dental composite: behavior and abilities.Dent Mater J. 2006;25(3):445-54.
Ilie N, Jelen E, Clementino-Luedemann T, Hickel R. Low-shrinkage composite for dental application.Dent Mater J. 2007;26(2):149-55.
Lien W, Vandewalle KS. Physical properties of a new silorane-based restorative system. Dent Mat. 2010;26(4):337-44.
Van Ende A, De Munck J, Mine A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Does a low-shrinking composite induce less stress at the adhesive interface?Dent Mater. 2010;26(3):215-22.
Al-Boni R, Raja OM. Microleakage evaluation of silorane based composite versus methacrylate based composite.J Conserv Dent. 2010;13(3):152-5.
Marchesi G, Breschi L, Antoniolli F, Di Lenarda R, Ferracane J, Cadenaro M. Contraction stress of low-shrinkage composite materials assessed with different testing systems.Dent Mater. 2010;26(10):947-53.
Boushell LW, Getz G, Swift EJ Jr, Walter R. Bond strengths of a silorane composite to various substrates.Am J Dent. 2011;24(2):93-6.
Krifka S, Federlin M, Hiller KA, Schmalz G. Microleakage of silorane- and methacrylate-based class V composite restorations.Clin Oral Investig. 2011 Sep 27. [Epub ahead of print]
Almeida e Silva JS, Rolla JN, Baratieri LN, Monteiro S Jr. The influence of different placement techniques on the microtensile bond strength of low-shrink silorane composite bonded to Class I cavities.Gen Dent. 2011;59(6):e233-7.
Buchgraber B, Kqiku L, Allmer N, Jakopic G, Städtler P.Surface roughness of one nanofill and one silorane composite after polishing.Coll Antropol. 2011;35(3):879-83.
Schmidt M, Kirkevang LL, Hørsted-Bindslev P, Poulsen S. Marginal adaptation of a low-shrinkage silorane-based composite: 1-year randomized clinical trial.Clin Oral Investig. 2011;15(2):291-5.
Gao BT, Lin H, Han JM, Zheng G. Polymerization characteristics, flexural modulus and microleakage evaluation of silorane-based and methacrylate-based composites.Am J Dent. 2011;24(2):97-102.
Van Ende A, Mine A, De Munck J, Poitevin A, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding of low-shrinking composites in high C-factor cavities.J Dent. 2012;40(4):295-303.
Kikuti WY, Chaves FO, Di Hipólito V, Rodrigues FP, D Alpino PH. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with different resin-based restorative systems.Braz Oral Res. 2012;26(3):275-81.
Gao BT,Lin H,Zheng G,Xu YX,Yang JL. Comparison between a silorane-based composite and methacrylate-based composites: shrinkage characteristics, thermal properties, gel point and vitrification point.Dent Mater J. 2012;31(1):76-85.
Segura A, Riggins R. Fracture resistance of four different restorations for cuspal replacement.J Oral Rehabil. 1999;26(12):928-31.
67.Soares PV, Santos-Filho PC, Martins LR, Soares CJ. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode.. 2008;99(1):30-7.
Sagsen B, Aslan B. Effect of bonded restorations on the fracture resistance of root filled teeth.Int Endod J. 2006;39(11):900-4.
Steele A, Johnson BR. In vitro fracture strength of endodontically treated premolars.J Endod. 1999;25(1):6-8.
70.Oskoee PA, Ajami AA, Navimipour EJ, Oskoee SS, Sadjadi J. The effect of three composite fiber insertion techniques on fracture resistance of root-filled teeth.. 2009;35(3):413-6.
71.Cobankara FK, Unlu N, Cetin AR, Ozkan HB. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars.. 2008;33(5):526-33.
72.D'Alpino PH, Bechtold J, dos Santos PJ, Alonso RC, Di Hipólito V, Silikas N, Rodrigues FP.Methacrylate- and silorane-based composite restorations: hardness, depth of cure and interfacial gap formation as a function of the energy dose.. 2011;27(11):1162-9.
Senawongse P, Pongprueksa P, Tagami J. The effect of the elastic modulus of low-viscosity resins on the microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations under occlusal loading.Dent Mater J. 2010;29(3):324-9.
Majety KK, Pujar M. In vitroevaluation of microleakage of class II packable composite resin restorations using flowable composite and resin modified glass ionomers as intermediate layers. J Conserv Dent. 2011;14(4):414–17.
75.Stefanski S, van Dijken JW. Clinical performance of a nanofilled resin composite with and without an intermediary layer of flowable composite: a 2-year evaluation.. 2012;16(1):147-53.
Boeckler A, Schaller HG, Gernhardt CR. A prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial of a one-step, self-etch adhesive with and without an intermediary layer of a flowable composite: A 2-year evaluation. Quintessence Int. 2012;43(4):279-86.
Chen RS, Liu CC, Cheng MR, Lin CP. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner. Oper Dent. 2000;25(5):411-7.
Tolidis K, Nobecourt A, Randall RC. Effect of a resin-modified glass ionomer liner on volumetric polymerization shrinkage of various composites.Dent Mater. 1998;14(6):417-23.
Bonifácio CC, van Amerongen WE, Meschini TG, Raggio DP, Bönecker M.Flowable glass ionomer cement as a liner: improving marginal adaptation of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations. J Dent Child (Chic). 2010;77(1):12-6.
Assis CP, Moyses MR, Teixeira HM, Ribeiro JC, Ribeiro JG, Dias SC.Fatigue limits for composite restorations with and without glass ionomer cement