فهرست:
چکیده:............................................. 1
فصل اول : طرح پژوهش
1-1)مقدمه.......................................... 4
۱-۲) بیان مسئله.................................... 5
1-3) ضرورت و اهمیت پژوهش............................ 7
1-4) اهداف پژوهش:.................................. 8
1-4-1) اهداف کلی پژوهش:............................ 8
1-4-2) اهداف جزئی پژوهش............................ 8
1-5) فرضیههای پژوهش................................ 9
1-6) محدودیتهای پژوهش.............................. 10
1-7) تعریف واژهها و اصطلاحات پژوهش................. 10
فصل دوم: مبانی نظری و پیشینه ی پژوهش
2-1) مقدمه........................................ 12
2-2-1)مبانی نظری پژوهش............................ 12
2-2-1-1)مبانی کلی آناتومیکی ناحیه ساق............. 12
2-2-1-1-1) درشتنی ................................ 14
2-2-1-1-2) نازکنی ................................ 17
2- 2- 2 ( بیومکانیک دویدن ......................... 18
2-2-2-1 ( مراحل دویدن ............................. 18
2-2-2-2)الگوی دویدن .............................. 21
2-2-4)کفش نهرین(آدیبست)............................ 23
2-2-5) استرس فراکچر ............................... 24
2-2-6)پیشینه پژوهش................................ 38
2-3)نتیجهگیری................................... 39
فصل سوم : روششناسی پژوهش
3-1)مقدمه....................................... 41
3-2)طرح پژوهش و روش پژوهش: ..................... 41
3- 3 ) مشخصات آزمودنیها ........................ 41
3-3-1 ) جامعه و نمونه آماری ..................... 41
3-3-2) آزمودنیها ............................... 41
3-3-2-1) شرایط عمومی ورود به آزمون ............. 41
3-4) متغیرهای پژوهش ............................ 42
3-4-1) متغیر مستقل ............................. 42
3-4-2) متغیر وابسته ........................... 42
3-5) پروتکل پژوهش ............................. 43
3-6) تجهیزات و ابزار اندازهگیری ................. 44
3-6-1) ابزار اندازهگیری قد و وزن آزمودنیها ..... 44
3-6-2) ابزار ثبت متغیرهای سینتیکی .............. 44
3-6-3) ابزار کنترل سرعت دویدن ................... 45
3-7) نحوه جمعآوری دادهها ......................... 45
3-7-1) کفشهای موردمطالعه........................ 46
3-7-1-1)کفش آدیداس.............................. 46
3-7-1-2) کفش نهرین(آدیبست)....................... 46
3-7-2) ثبت اطلاعات سینتیک........................ 47
3-7-3) نحوه محاسبه متغیر وابسته................... 47
3-8) روش آماری.................................. 47
فصل چهارم: تجزیهوتحلیل یافتههای پژوهش
4-1) مقدمه......................................... 49
4-2) توصیف دادهها................................. 49
4-3) آزمون فرضیههای تحقیق........................... 51
4-3-1) آزمون فرض اول.............................. 51
4-3-2) آزمون فرضیه دوم............................ 52
4-3-3) آزمون فرضیه سوم ........................... 53
4-3-3-1) فرض چهارم................................ 54
4-3-3-2) فرض پنجم................................. 56
4-3-3-3) فرض ششم.................................. 57
4-3-3-4) فرض هفتم................................. 58
4-3-3-4) فرض هشتم................................. 59
فصل پنجم : نتایج و پیشنهادات
5-1) مقدمه........................................ 62
5-2) خلاصهای از نحوهی انجام پژوهش و یافتهها.......... 62
5-3) بحث و بررسی................................... 63
5-3-1) متغیرهای حداکثر نیروی غیرفعال عمودی و خلفی. 63
5-3-2) متغیرهای سرعت بارگذاری نیروهای عمودی و خلفی 65
5-3-3) متغیرهای زمان رسیدن به حداکثر نیروهای عمودی و خلفی 65
5-4) نتیجهگیری.................................... 67
5-5) پیشنهادها.................................... 68
پیشنهادها برای جامعه.............................. 68
پیشنهادها برای تحقیقات آتی......................... 68
منابع............................................. 70
چکیده لاتین........................................ 75
منبع:
Bischof, J., Abbey, A., Chuckpaiwong, B., Nunley, J., Mac Queen, R. 2010. Three-dimensional ankle kinematics and kinetics during running in women. Gait & Posture. 31, 502–505.
Bishop, M., Fiolkowski,P., Conrad, B., Brunt., M. 2006. Athletic footwear; leg stiffness, and running kinematics. Journal of athletic Training. 41(4) , 387–392.
Chuckpaiwong, B., Cook, C., Pietrobon, R., Nunley, J. 2007. Second metatarsal stress fracture in sport: comparative risk factors between proximal and non-proximal locations. British Journal of Sports Medicine; 41, 510–4.
Chuter, V., xanne A.K. Jange, De.2012. Proximal and distal contribu tions to lower exter mity injury: A review of literature. Gait and posture. 32,425–5.
Creaby, M., Dixon, Sh.2007. Tibia kinetics Tibia stress fracture Risk. Journal of biomechanics.
Crowell, H, Ph., Davis, S.2010. Gait retraining to reduce lower extremity loading in runners. Cliuical biomecllamics.
Denton, J.D. 2005 Light Does Not Make Right. Running Times 324, 78.
Dickson, M., Fuss, F., Burton, M. 2010. Development of standardized test method for characterizing the stiffness of heel sole segments of sport shoes. Procedia Engineering. 2: 2801-2804.
Dixon, Sh, J., creaby, M, W., Allsopp, A, J.2007. Comparsion of static and dynamic recruits with and without a history of third metatarsal stress fracture. Clinical biomechanics.
Dugan, S. A., & Bhat, K. P. 2005. Biomechanics and analysis of running gait. Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, 16(3), 603e621.
Edvards, W., Derrik, T.2010.Effects of running speed on a probablistic stress fracture modle. Clinical biomechanics.
Edvards, W., Gillete, J., Thomas, J., Derrick, T.2008. Internal femoral force and moments during running: mplications for stress fracture development. Clinical biomechanics.
Everett, B., Sackiriyas, K., Wesley, R. 2011. A comparison of the spatiotemporal parameters, kinematics, and biomechanics between shod, unshod, and minimally supported running as compared to walking.12: 151- 163.
Fineston, H., Cools, A., sira, C. 2008. The roal of foot pronation in the developmentof femoral and Tibia stress fracture. Clinical biomechanics.
Fredricson, M., jong, K., Bergman, G., Gold, G.2004. Femoral diaphyseal stress fracture. Physical trapy in sport.
George, W, T., Vashishth, D.2003. Influence of phase angle between axital and Torsianal loading on fatique fracture of bone. Journal of biomechauics.
Kutzer, a. And et al. 2010. Loading of the knee joint during activities of daily living measured in vivo in five subjects. Journal of Biomechanics. 43: 2164-2173.
Logan, S., Ian Hunter, J., Ty Hopkins, J., Feland, B., Parcell, A. 2010. Ground Reaction Force DifferencessBeween Running Shoes, Racing Flats, and Distance Spikes in Runners. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine: 9, 147-153.
Mcginnnis, P. 2005. Biomechanics of Sport and Exercise. 2nd Edition. 640-645.
Milner CE, Ferber R, Pollard D, et al. 2006. Biomechanical factors associatedwith tibial stress fracture in female runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc; 38(2):323–8.
Milner, C., Davis, s., Hamill, J. 2005. Free moment is a predictor of Tibia stress fracture in distance runners. Journal of biomechanics.
Milner, C., Davis, S., Hamill, J.2004. Is free moment realated to Tibia stress fracture? Medicin and science in sport.
Milner, C., Ferber, Hamill, pollard, Davis. 2007. Biomechanical factors issociated with Tibial stress fracture in femule runners. Medicin and science in sport and exercise.
Milner, C., Hamill, J., Davis, S.2007. Are Knee mechanics during early stance realated to Tibia stress fracture in runnrers? Clinical biomechanics.
Mundermann, A., Wakeling, J., Nigg, B., Darren, R., stefanyshyn.2007. Foot orthoses affect frequency component of muscle activity in the lower Extermity. Gaite and posture.
Nigg BM, Emery C, Hiemstra LA. 2006. Unstable Shoe Construction and Reduction of Pain in Osteoarthritis Patients. Med Sci Sports Exerc; 38: 1701–8.
Nigg, B. 2010. Biomechanics of Sport Shoes.First Edition. Topline Printing Inc. Calgary, Alberta. 263-274.
Novacheck,T. 1998. Running Injurie: A Biomechanical Approach The Journal Of Bone And Joint Surgery. 80: 8.
Pohi, M., mullineaux, D., milner, C., Hamill, J., Davis, S.2008. Biomechanical predictors of retrospective Tibia stress fracture in runners.jornal of biomechanic.
Queen R.mall, N. nunley, J. chockpaiwong.2009. D.iffrences in plantar loading between flat and normal feet daring athetice task. Gait and postur.
Sasimontonkul, s. Bay, b, Pavol, m. 2007. Bone contact forces on the distal tibia during the stance phase of running. Journal of Biomechanics. 40: 3503–3509.
Sharma, J., Golby, J., Greeves, J., Spreas, A.2010. Biomechanical and lifestyle risk factors for medial tibia stress fracture syndrome in army recruits: A prospective study. Gait and posture.
Shultz, R., Birmingham, T., Jenkyn, T. 2011. Differences in neutral foot positions when measured barefoot compared to in shoes with varying stiffness. Medical Engineering & Physics. 33: 1309-1313.
Tanaguchi, M., Tateuchi, H., Takeoka, T., Ichihashi, N. 2012. Kinematic and Kinetic Characteristics of Masai Barefoot Technology Footwear. Gait & Posture; 35: 567–572.
Wheat, j.Milner, C.2008.Association between foot Type and Tibia stress fracture: A systematic review. Sport biomchanic.
Wiegerinck, J., Boyd, J., Yoder, J., Abbey, A., Nunley, J., Mac Queen, R. 2009. Differences in Plantar Loading between Training Shoes and Racing Flats at a Self-Selected Running Speed. Gait & Posture 29, 514–519.
Wiegerinck, J., Boyd, J., Yoder, J., Abbey, A., Nunley, J., Mac Queen, R. 2009. Differences in Plantar Loading between Training Shoes and Racing Flats at a Self-Selected Running Speed. Gait & Posture 29, 514–519.
Williams, T, M., Clercqe, D, De. Gvandrestreaten, k, D., Cock, A, De. Witvrouw, E.2004. A prospective study of Gaite realated risk factors for exercise – realted lower leg pain. Gait and postur.
Winter, David A.Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement, Fourth Edition. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. p 83.
Zadpoor, A., Nikooyan, A. 2010. The realation ship between Lower extremity stress fractures and the ground reaction force: Asystematic review. Clinical biomechanics.
Zifchock, R, A., Davis, S., Hamill, J.2005. Kinetic Asymmetry in female runners with and without retrospective Tibia stress fracture. Journal of biomechanics.